From the papers

Odd knowledge

These are other researchers’ results, not a study run by BOSS Cleaning. Figures are the ones those papers printed, including the results that spoil a common habit. A claim with no citation did not make this page.

Published findings

Arrow keys move the topics. Surprise me chooses one fact and moves focus to it.

01

Bath

Closing the lid did not cut the contamination

A University of Arizona group seeded household and public toilets in the United States with MS2, a stand-in for viruses shed in stool, and flushed. Contamination of the restroom surfaces they sampled did not depend on whether the lid was up or down. In that seeded test, the underside of the seat averaged more than 10 million plaque-forming units per 100 square centimeters, which is the load they created, not a count from ordinary bathrooms. Compared with brushing and no product, a hydrochloric-acid bowl cleaner cut virus in the bowl water by more than 99.99 percent and on the brush by 97.64 percent, with no significant drop on the seat, rim, floor, lid, or brush holder.

Goforth, Boone, Clark, Valenzuela, McKinney, Ijaz, and Gerba. Impacts of lid closure during toilet flushing and of toilet bowl cleaning on viral contamination of surfaces in United States restrooms. American Journal of Infection Control, 2024. Funded by a grant from Reckitt Benckiser. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2023.11.020

02

Kitchen

Reported sponge cleaning did not lower the count

Fourteen used kitchen sponges from homes near Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany, were sequenced and checked under a confocal microscope. Bacteria ran through the sponge, and the densest patches reached 5.4 × 1010 cells per cubic centimeter, a local figure rather than an average for the whole sponge. Sponges whose owners said they sanitized them regularly, by microwave or hot soapy water, did not contain fewer bacteria than sponges left alone, and close relatives of Moraxella osloensis and Chryseobacterium hominis made up a larger share of the sanitized ones. The authors suggested replacing sponges often, with a week offered as an example, because this was not a controlled test of those methods.

Cardinale, Kaiser, Lueders, Schnell, and Egert. Microbiome analysis and confocal microscopy of used kitchen sponges reveal massive colonization by Acinetobacter, Moraxella and Chryseobacterium species. Scientific Reports, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06055-9

03

Kitchen

Transfer started in under a second

Watermelon, bread, buttered bread, and gummy candy were dropped onto stainless steel, ceramic tile, wood, and carpet inoculated with Enterobacter aerogenes and dried for five hours. Some bacteria transferred in less than one second. Longer contact raised the transfer, but the food and the surface mattered as much or more: more bacteria moved to watermelon than to the other foods, and carpet gave up less than tile or steel. The five-second rule is a slope with a head start, not a safe window.

Miranda and Schaffner. Longer contact times increase cross-contamination of Enterobacter aerogenes from surfaces to food. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01838-16

04

Air

The exhaust is part of the dust

Twenty-one vacuum cleaners were measured for particles and bacteria leaving the machine. Bacterial emissions ran from 0 to 740,000 per minute. Fine particles, PM2.5, ran from 0.24 to 5,400 micrograms per minute. Price, age, the dust bag, and an exhaust filter did not explain most of that spread.

Knibbs, He, Duchaine, and Morawska. Vacuum cleaner emissions as a source of indoor exposure to airborne particles and bacteria. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012 (online 15 November 2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/es202946w

05

Bath

The film is inside the showerhead

Forty-five showerheads from nine U.S. cities were swabbed on the inside. Microscopy showed microbes clumped in a biofilm, and in municipal water the nontuberculous mycobacterial sequences were enriched more than 100-fold above the supply water. Those mycobacterial sequences appeared in the municipal systems they sampled, not in the untreated well-water heads. Mycobacterium avium sequences were in 20 percent of swabs and, when present, averaged 32 percent of that swab’s sequence library.

Feazel, Baumgartner, Peterson, Frank, Harris, and Pace. Opportunistic pathogens enriched in showerhead biofilms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0908446106

06

Habits

The entry floor kept what the shoes brought in

Enterococci and fecal coliforms were measured inside one New York City institutional building, on occupants’ shoe soles, and in sidewalk puddles outside. Mean enterococci were highest in the busy entryway, and counts were significantly higher on carpet than on the uncarpeted floor next to it. Pooled rainwater on those sidewalks averaged 31,000 enterococci per 100 milliliters. It is one building, not a national average.

Leri and Khan. Faecal indicator bacteria on indoor floors linked to exterior sidewalk contamination in New York City. Indoor and Built Environment, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X231153566

07

Habits

Most of the failures still looked acceptable

A hospital ward and an operating theatre were scored by eye, by bacterial culture, and by ATP, a test for organic residue. Of the sites monitored after routine cleaning, 18 percent looked unacceptable, 70 percent failed the microbiological limit the authors used, and 76 percent failed the ATP limit. Overall, general bacterial counts and ATP were not significantly different before and after that clean. The routine under study did not include a biocide.

Griffith, Cooper, Gilmore, Davies, and Lewis. An evaluation of hospital cleaning regimes and standards. Journal of Hospital Infection, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhin.1999.0717

08

Habits

Disinfectant did not improve the microfiber system

Twenty-four hospital rooms were cleaned in each setup. With a detergent, the microfiber system removed about 95 percent of the bacteria they plated, and a cotton-string mop removed about 68 percent. A quaternary ammonium disinfectant brought the cotton mop to about 95 percent and did not significantly change the microfiber system. The result belongs to that floor trial, not to every cloth sold for a home.

Rutala, Gergen, and Weber. Microbiologic evaluation of microfiber mops for surface disinfection. American Journal of Infection Control, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.02.009

The bookable work is residential, commercial, and post-restoration cleaning. Request an estimate.